Monday, 12 January 2009
Planning Tricks: Photography Timings

Over the last few weeks as I’ve been reviewing 2008 and going over each of our weddings with a fine tooth comb, I’ve been considering the traditional timings of group and portrait photography at weddings. Most couples tend to plan time for these kind of photos during their drinks reception but there are a number of reasons why this doesn’t work perfectly and so I’ve been wondering whether scheduling photography for prior to the ceremony (frequently done in the US) is actually a better alternative.
Very often group and portrait photography is the first thing to overrun at weddings and although keeping to time might sound simple, invariably it is not. Following the ceremony, couples are excited to see their guests and reluctant to leave the party just as it’s getting started whilst guests begin to disperse themselves across the venue. Ensuring ushers get the right people in the right place at the right time can be a tricky exercise (especially when they don’t know who’s who) and asking a friend to bellow out the names of those needed for each shot is functional but can give your wedding a school-trip meets boot camp feel.
Scheduling photographs for before the ceremony not only means you bypass all of these problems but you also gain some significant benefits:
• You’re photographed looking your absolute best, sans smudged eyeliner and crumpled buttonholes.
• You get to spend the entire of your drinks reception chatting to your guests and soaking up the atmosphere rather than watching from afar as all the champagne gets guzzled.
• Your drinks reception will be more relaxed and enjoyable as you’ll be free from the worry that you need to get those all-important shots before dinner is served.
• You’ll get better photographs. Not only can you dedicate longer to getting some really creative images, without the pressure of time you’ll be more relaxed so look better and happier in the shots.
• Your drinks reception needn’t be hours long in order to accommodate a long photo session; you reduce the risk of bored guests and a flat atmosphere.
• You get the chance to start celebrations early, spending some quality time with your closest friends and family before the ceremony.
The major drawback to scheduling photography prior to the ceremony is that the first time you see each other won’t be as the bride walks down the aisle. However, this needn’t mean loosing the magic of seeing each other for the first time and does in fact have its own advantages. Seeing each other prior to the ceremony means you get the chance to talk to each other, calming your nerves and giving you the chance to really soak up the ‘we’re getting married feeling’ without being distracted by the wedding planning or ceremony proceedings.
Meeting each other before the ceremony needn’t be a negative thing either – you can make it into a really special moment, perhaps meet somewhere really special or get the chance for 5 minutes alone.
So there you have it, my thoughts on the matter. I’d love to hear yours so please drop me a comment!
Photo credit:
Martha Stewart Weddings
Posted in General Wedding, Planning Tricks, photography.
Bookmark: Delicious, Digg, Facebook, StumbleUpon

I am biased but scheduling time to allow for pictures is important. It’s one thing I always ask clients – they are investing in quality work so allowing time for the creation of the images would only seem sensible.
However timing is core to the flow of the day and it’s generally not my job to plan for the client. I can only advise and demonstrate the difference between a rushed set of images and a set that were properly planned.
Thank you for publishing this it’s something all B’s & G’s should consider in their planning.
Best regards, Ian.
I’m inclined to agree. I’ve been a bridesmaid at weddings when the photos were taken before and at weddings where photos were taken after the ceremony. It was lovely for the bride to get the precious alone time with her h2b before they had to mingle with everyone.
Zoe,
A great, thought provoking article. As a photographer I’d agree with the points you make where you list the benefits, especially the likelihood of better images. Many American photographers get stunning images from the initial meeting between bride and groom. This meeting is a private event and held away from guests and certainly strikes me as a very tender and emotional moment. I suspect the key issue is the UK ‘tradition’ and whether there are enough Bride & Grooms willing to break with tradition!
Stephen
[...] See Zoe’s full blog article here. [...]
Scheduling of the wedding photos before the wedding would be a great idea. It may interfere with the traditional, groom doesn’t see the bride before the ceremony, but it would afford the bride and groom a lot more time with the wedding guests.
At our wedding our photos ran later than expected and we had to drop the receiving line to have everyone seated for dinner.
Hi Zoe.
An excellent article.
I’ve shot a few weddings where we did all the classic shots before the ceremony and they were amongst the most relaxed weddings I’ve done.
Since moving to the UK I’ve found that people are less keen on the idea, but who knows, that may change!
I’ve quoted the article on my blog
http://www.alexkilbeephotography.co.uk/blog
Alex